Political Psychic
Daily Rants about Politics

Archive for the ‘New Post’ Category

Tarot cards: Obama’s fate from BP disaster

Saturday, May 29th, 2010

This turned into an interesting reading.

The question placed before the cards was:

What will be the result to Obama — of his response to the handling of the BP oil disaster.

The answers in cards came – from left to right:

1) Ace of Cups – Reversed:  Loss of faith, respect, and disappointment

2) Cups – The Page – Reversed: Bad news received, tempers flared, outbursts.

3) The Fool – Reversed:  Innocence and image of naivete lost; can also be read as possible warning against rash decisions.

BP’s Fate

Saturday, May 29th, 2010


Tarot cards I drew asking a question about BP’s fate.

The first card is a 4 of Pentacles:   This card signifies greed, stinginess, and also signifies a fear of risk, change and bureaucracy.

The second card is a Four of Cups-Reversed. It signifies broken or lost expectations, exhaustion, over-indulgence, and poor health.

The last card is a major arcana card, No. 14, Temperance – in the reversed position. This sign signifies impatience or lack of time, poor handling of a situation that is volatile.

Funny how truthful this was, huh?

I will do more on this later today – check back again!

The Raging Grannies sing “Halliburton & BP You Suck!”

Friday, May 28th, 2010

The Video BP Oil Doesn’t Want You to See

Sunday, May 23rd, 2010

This place is a gym – and a church.

Friday, May 21st, 2010

I’m guessing they host gun shows, too.

Racism isn’t a Right

Thursday, May 20th, 2010

Rand Paul’s interview on Rachel Maddow was simply mind-blowing.

Basically, Rand Paul is arguing for the rights of private business owners to discriminate – even though he claims he’s not a racist.

But he keeps claiming that discrimination by private businesses should be allowed if it is desired.

So, let me see – I should have the protected right to say “I hate niggers” and make hate speech legal?? I should have the right to hang a sign in front of my business that says “Whites Only”?

Rand Paul compared it to carrying a weapon inside a private business, and that a store owner has the right to  discriminate against a gun owner. Rachel correctly  pointed out that carrying a gun into a private business is a choice – and a store owner can ban your gun from coming inside. But people of color don’t have a choice – they don’t get to choose their color – nor should they be banned from a private business because of it.  She explained to Rand Paul that blacks had their heads bashed in for sitting in”whites only” seats.  That private businesses were allowed to institutionalize racist practices, which led to violent confrontations with blacks.

Rand Paul basically claims he’d march arm in arm with Martin Luther King, Jr. if he were alive today. Maybe so – but I don’t think anyone in their right mind would think he’d be a welcomed guest.

Intolerance isn’t a right. Intolerance is hate. I’m not going to tolerate intolerance – and the whole idea of making “tolerance of intolerance” a right is simply bat-shit crazy.

An Inspiring Message

Friday, May 14th, 2010

http://m.dailykos.com/stories/2010/5/14/866405/-Letter-from-Baghdad:-I-am-good-enough-to-serve-in-war,-but-not-at-peace.html

A very good joke comparing Republicans with Democrats

Thursday, May 13th, 2010

A woman in a hot air balloon realized she was lost. She lowered her altitude and spotted a man in a boat below. She shouted to him,

“Excuse me, can you help me? I promised a friend I would meet him an hour ago, but I don’t know where I am.”

The man consulted his portable GPS and replied,

“You’re in a hot air balloon, approximately 30 feet above ground elevation of 2,346 feet above sea level. You are at 31 degrees, 14.97 minutes north latitude and 100 degrees, 49.09 minutes west longitude. “

“She rolled her eyes and said, “You must be an Obama Democrat.”

“I am,” replied the man. “How did you know?”

“Well,” answered the balloonist, “everything you told me is technically correct. But I have no idea what to do with your information, and I’m still lost. Frankly, you’ve not been much help to me.”

The man smiled and responded, “You must be a Republican.”

“I am,” replied the balloonist. “How did you know?”

“Well,” said the man, “you don’t know where you are or where you are going. You’ve risen to where you are due to a large quantity of hot air. You made a promise you have no idea how to keep, and you expect me to solve your problem. You’re in exactly the same position you were in before we met, but somehow, now it’s my fault.”

Credit to KPOJ 620 AM’s Carl Wolfson – blog

“Myths” about Kagan aren’t – They’re more like “Poison Pills”

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

The left is for some strange reason defending the Kagan choice.

Initially, the only reason I thought I might like her is because she’s more than likely a lesbian. I’m a little biased. If she is (and rumors are out there that she is indeed), then I would think that she’s someone who has got some “umpf” in the courtroom. Someone who can hit back when she’s hit hard.

But last night, I really changed my mind about her. It was during the Rachel Maddow Show (did you catch it??). Rachel played an audio clip of Kagan and Justice Roberts during the Citizens United case. Kagan was a basket case in the audio clip.

After that sad piece of audio, I knew exactly why Obama picked this woman. He picked her because she CAN’T fight! She stammers and gets tongue-tied, is easily flustered and confused. She’s supposed to be a lawyer – not a verbal flounder!!!! My head was spinning, trying to understand why we would want such a horrible orator on our damned side! No wonder she dropped the ball in the Citizens United case. She probably can’t even argue her way out of a sick day home from work!

Then today, on Media Matters (my heroes – usually), I saw the following list — why Kagan should be defended – basically trying to debunk “myths” about Kagan from the right-wing: (I put my notes after “ANSWER:”)

MYTH: Kagan’s Policies On Military Recruiters Make Her “An Anti-Military Zealot” …

ANSWER: This court needs an “ANTI-MILILTARY ZEALOT” who is willing to stand up to the military industrial complex which has kept us at war and profiting off it for the past 9-years

MYTH: Kagan’s Thesis Shows She’s A Socialist …

ANSWER: This country needs balance – we need socialism as much as we need capitalism. What we really need is responsibility and truth-telling. The banksters on Wall Street need to see the inside of a jail cell – and Obama’s not earning trust by protecting these crooks instead of prosecuting them.

MYTH: Kagan Is Unqualified Because She Hasn’t Been A Judge

ANSWER: It’s called standards. Everyone believes in mavericks who buck the system – People who break the mold and can prove they are up to snuff without being the stereotypical image of something. I still want a judge “type” who has actual written opinions – Someone who has demonstrated, in writing, what their belief system is. Don’t make me guess or wonder. Give me some evidence I can point to! I don’t want a f*cking chameleon as a judge – someone who blends in like a wallflower. I want a fighter – not a flower.

WATCH: Fox’s Bream: Kagan Is “Brilliant” And A “Consensus-Builder” … Fox Hosts SCOTUS Expert Who Debunks Myth That Kagan Isn’t Qualified … Napolitano: Kagan’s “Credentials Are Impeccable” … Fox Anchor: “[E]verybody Seems To Agree” Kagan Has “An Incredible Mind, A First-Rate Intellect”

ANSWER: I DON’T WANT A CONSENSUS BUILDER – I WANT A F*CKING **FIGHTER**

As Expected, Limbaugh Calls Kagan “Elitist Radical,” “Babe”

ANSWER: Who the hell even cares about Rush calling her a babe????!!

Fox Claims Kagan Has “No Experience” … By Contrast, Several Fox Reporters And Legal Experts Highlighted Kagan’s Experience … Note To Media: Dozens Of Supreme Court Justices And Two Of The Past Four Chief Justices Had No Prior Judicial Experience

Hannity’s Answer To “Who Is Elena Kagan” Relies On Four Falsehoods In Less Than 2 Minutes … Right-Wing Media Falsely Claim Kagan Is “Anti-Military” … Beck: Kagan Is “[A]nother Left Activist” … Limbaugh: Kagan “Is A Pure Academic Elitist Radical”

ANSWER: Am I supposed to believe this? A pure academic?? I’d LOVE it if she actually were!!

————–

Basically, I think that Kagan is a poison pill from Obama to the left. We’re supposed swallow the B.S. about Kagan being a great debater. If we don’t fight against this nomination, it will be the end of the leftwing as we know it. Obama has already decided there will not be any prosecutions against Bush, and has nothing but Bush leftovers on his cabinet. Hell, we’re stuck carrying Bush & Cheney’s water with their Wall Street boyz Geitner and Paulson.

Ugh. My head hurts!

OMG…Elena Kagan IS Harriet Meirs

Monday, May 10th, 2010

I don’t care if she doesn’t have any judicial experience. But I *do* care about the fact that she has absolutely no real ability to argue in front of the Supreme Court. Harriet Meirs was equally frightening. Actually, she was a little scarier. She had love letters written to Bush. (eeewww… chills…)

I just heard a clip tonight on Rachel Maddow – of Elena Kagan doing the very thing Obama says she’s "good" at – at being “persuasive”.

It was pretty sad and almost stomach-turning. I could hardly keep myself from cringing. She kept stuttering and stammering, barely getting a sentence out before being interrupted by Justice John Roberts – the very person she’s gonna supposedly share a court with!!! And we’re all supposed to believe she’s gonna be able to convince HIM?

This woman is DOA.

So sad.