Political Psychic
Daily Rants about Politics

Archive for December, 2009

I’m so angry, I can hardly see straight: Elections will be RIGGED by our own U.S. Government

Tuesday, December 15th, 2009

So instead of having to worry about an independent contractor like Diebold rigging the elections, we now have to worry about who our own government appoints to oversee its own elections.

And all this time, I was happy because “at least Republicans aren’t running elections anymore”

—————————————————-

Reprinted from the Bradblog site: (because I’m too effing pissed off right now to write anything coherent)


>

Disgraceful: Discredited E-Voting Vendor VP Appointed to U.S. EAC Advisory Panel

Federal body tasked with overseeing U.S. certification of e-voting systems appoints scammer Edwin Smith, VP of e-voting companies Sequoia, Dominion, Hart-Intercivic…

Incredible. This would be the equivalent of appointing the sitting Vice President of Exxon Mobil to an EPA advisory committee, but Ed Smith has now been appointed to the disastrous U.S. Election Assistance Commission’s (EAC’s) Technical Guidelines Development Committee as one of their new “Technical and Scientific Experts.”

From the EAC’s email announcement on Friday (posted in full at end of article):

Edwin B. Smith, III, vice president of compliance and certification at Dominion Voting Systems. Before joining Dominion Voting Systems, Mr. Smith was vice president of manufacturing, compliance, quality and certification at Sequoia Voting Systems. He also served as the operations manager at Hart InterCivic and the senior director of operations at K*TEC Electronics. He holds a Master of Business Administration from the University of Phoenix and a Bachelor of Science in engineering technology from Texas A&M.

So Smith went from voting machine company Hart Intercivic to voting machine company Sequoia Voting Systems and is now at voting machine company Dominion Voting Systems, where he is a VP, selling e-voting systems to jurisdictions around the country that receive federal money dolled out by the EAC. And now he’ll also sit on an advisory board at the EAC helping to advise which one of those companies sees their systems certified for use in U.S. elections by the EAC. Just amazing.

But that’s not even half the story of why this is just incredible, and another huge black eye for the EAC. (How many eyes do they have left to blacken at this point?) If you’re not a long time reader of The BRAD BLOG reader, and don’t recall who this Ed Smith is, read on. It’s simply stultifying…

Smith is the guy who, after years of paying a crackpot contractor named Mike Gibbons to do this and that for Sequoia with loads of federal Help America Vote Act (HAVA) tax-payer cash, assigned him to do an “independent” analysis of Sequoia’s touch-screen machines after they failed in NJ’s 2008 Super Tuesday election. That was just after Smith had sent a letter threatening two Princeton computer scientists with legal action “to stop any infringement of our intellectual properties, including any non-compliant analysis,” if they performed the actually independent analysis of the machines as they were tasked by NJ election officials to do. (Addtional outrage/irony shortly thereafter uncovered by The BRAD BLOG: Sequoia didn’t even own the Intellectual Property rights to the machines in question. Rather, the IP rights were, and are still to our knowledge, owned by Smartmatic, a Venezuelan firm tied to Hugo Chavez. Sequoia lied to both federal investigators and state election officials about that relationship.)

After The BRAD BLOG exposed who Smith’s friend Mike Gibbons actually was — a Sequoia insider, as well as a drunk and a philanderer with an obnoxious Facebook page seeking a “well endowed blonde nymphomaniac,” only to change the page after we’d outed him to feature a photo of him and George Bush Sr. and a professed love of Jesus Christ instead — Gibbons was fired. (He would be found dead a few months later, the actual cause of which we’ve never been able to ascertain.)

Smith was severely reprimanded at Sequoia for the embarrassing incident, and has now been rewarded by moving on to Dominion, which is in partnership with his old friends at Sequoia to supply the new, failed e-voting systems recently deployed, disasterously, for the first time in last November’s election — the one where the results of the NY-23 Special Election for U.S. House will now forever be in question. The Sequoia/Dominion contract to supply faulty, secret vote counting machines to NY-23 is worth some $20 million federal tax-payer dollars.

And now Smith’s been been named to advise the EAC, the actual federal body tasked with overseeing, testing, and approving voting systems for federal approval — the very body that is supposed to oversee the very scams that Smith attempts to pull off with his worthless, broken, easily hacked, often-failed, computerized secret vote-counting systems. And, in the case of the NY systems, they’re being used even though they are neither federally nor state certified yet.

This isn’t just the Fox in the Hen House. This is the Fox who has already devoured every Hen in the House, in the Hen House. With feathers in his mouth and a sub-machine gun in his hands.

The EAC is an absolute disgrace, and should long ago have been disbanded for one failure after another — including the approval of virtually every e-voting system in use today, virtually every one of which has failed spectacularly, even as the EAC has refused to decertify any of them. Enough is enough.

* * *


The complete Friday press release from the EAC, announcing Smith’s appointment, and others, follows in full below…

U.S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION
1225 New York Ave. NW – Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005

________________________________________

For Immediate Release
December 11, 2009

Contact:
Jeannie Layson
Sarah Litton
(202) 566-3100

New Technical and Scientific Experts Appointed to EAC’s Technical Guidelines Development Committee

WASHINGTON- The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) today announced the appointment of four new technical and scientific experts to its Technical Guidelines Development Committee (TGDC), which is charged under the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) with assisting EAC in developing federal voluntary voting system guidelines that are used to test and certify voting systems.

The following new members were appointed jointly by EAC and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST):

Steven M. Bellovin, professor of computer science at Columbia University. Dr. Bellovin’s research focuses on networks and security. Before joining the Columbia faculty in 2005, he spent many years at Bell Labs and AT&T Labs Research, where he was an AT&T Fellow. He holds a bachelor’s degree from Columbia University and a master’s and doctorate in computer science from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Diane Cordry Golden, program coordinator for the Association of Assistive Technology Act Programs. Dr. Cordry Golden has 30 years’ experience providing training and technical assistance on disability policy implementation and assistive/accessible technology service delivery to government and nonprofit organizations at the local, state and national level. She has a doctorate in special education administration with an emphasis in disability policy, a master’s degree in audiology, and a bachelor’s degree in speech-language pathology.

Douglas W. Jones, associate professor of computer science at University of Iowa. Mr. Jones served on the Iowa Board of Examiners for Voting Machines and Electronic Voting Systems for 10 years, where he helped examine and approve voting systems before they were sold to the state’s county governments. He testified at the U.S. Civil Rights Commission hearings in Tallahassee, Fla., on January 11, 2001, and was involved in reviewing the federal 2002 Voting System Standards.

Edwin B. Smith, III, vice president of compliance and certification at Dominion Voting Systems. Before joining Dominion Voting Systems, Mr. Smith was vice president of manufacturing, compliance, quality and certification at Sequoia Voting Systems. He also served as the operations manager at Hart InterCivic and the senior director of operations at K*TEC Electronics. He holds a Master of Business Administration from the University of Phoenix and a Bachelor of Science in engineering technology from Texas A&M.

“We welcome this distinguished group of experts to the committee,” said EAC Commissioner Donetta Davidson, the designated federal official of the TGDC. “We’ve just concluded our first two-day meeting with our new members, and it was filled with spirited, thoughtful and productive exchanges. We are fortunate to have such a dedicated and knowledgeable group of professionals working with us on federal voting system guidelines.”

HAVA established the TGDC to support the EAC by providing recommendations on voluntary standards and guidelines related to voting equipment and technologies. The TGDC’s first task was to draft the third iteration of federal voting system standards, known as the voluntary voting system guidelines, which EAC issued in December 2005. The TGDC continues to work on future iterations and revisions to the guidelines for consideration by the EAC Standards Board and Board of Advisors, and for ultimate consideration and adoption by EAC.

HAVA requires that members of the TGDC be made up of representatives from the American National Standards Institute, the National Association of State Election Directors (NASED), the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, the Architectural and Transportation Barrier Compliance Board (commonly referred to as the Access Board), the EAC Standards Board and the EAC Board of Advisors.

These organizations nominate new members to serve on the TGDC. Recent appointments include Access Board member Phillip Jenkins, senior software engineer of the IBM Human Ability and Accessibility Center; NASED member Ann McGeehan, director of the elections division, State of Texas Office of the Secretary of State; and EAC Standards Board member Donald Palmer, director of elections, Florida Department of State.

Other members of the committee include Ron Gardner, director of field services, National Federation of the Blind; Linda Lamone, administrator of elections, Maryland State Board of Elections; Paul Miller, voting systems manager, State of Washington, Office of the Secretary of State; Helen Purcell, county recorder, Maricopa County, Arizona; Russ Ragsdale, city and county clerk, City and County of Broomfield, Colorado; and David Wagner, associate professor, EECS Department, University of California-Berkeley. Patrick Gallagher, director of NIST, chairs the committee.

For information on TGDC resolutions, meeting minutes and related information, visit vote.nist.gov. Information about EAC’s voting system testing and certification process, including the federal 2005 Voluntary Voting System Guidelines, is available at www.eac.gov.

The EAC is an independent commission created by the Help America Vote Act. The EAC serves as a national clearinghouse and resource of information regarding election administration. It is charged with administering payments to states and developing guidance to meet HAVA requirements, adopting voluntary voting system guidelines, and accrediting voting system test laboratories and certifying voting equipment. It is also charged with developing and maintaining a national mail voter registration form. The three EAC commissioners are Gineen Beach, chair; Gracia Hillman, vice chair; and Donetta Davidson. There is one vacancy on the commission.

I don’t understand why Obama & Blue Dog Dems want to pay for another war instead of health care

Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009

The blue dogs consistently claim that they’re “all for reforming health care – as long as it’s not too expensive”.

But if you ask them if $100 billion per year is “too much” for another war – they’re all on board, behind Obama and the Republicans.

Literally, we have more children living in poverty now than any other time in history (since the great depression), and unemployment is in the double-digits.

Obama says healthcare costs must be controlled, and nothing of substantial change will occur until 2013…!!!!!

But another 3-4 years in Afghanistan? Hell yeah, let’s spend another $2-3 BILLION PER WEEK for a war we CANNOT AFFORD!

I seriously don’t give a rat’s ass about terrorism – Sorry, but I just don’t. Your chances of being killed in a terrorist attack? You are more likely to win the lottery – twice – this year – than to ever – EVER – be killed by a terrorist.

More people die in plane crashes per year than in terrorist attacks.

Are we doing anything about airline safety – due to crashes? Nope. Are we doing anything about safety when it involves terrorism? Every single g-damned time I go the airport, I’m reminded of what a huge effing a-hole G.W. Bush was on 9/11, pretending to care more about capturing Bin Laden, but instead sending us to Iraq to hi-jack oil fields for his buddies.

But, hey, I shouldn’t complain.

We have a “Democrat” in the White House – who will more than likely help the Republicans get control next November.

Jack Cafferty: You were an absolute idiot today on CNN

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009

I want to respond openly about Jack Cafferty’s commentary on “the hypocrisy of celebrities who fly jets and preach about being green”.

Today, on CNN’s Situation Room w/Wolf Blitzer, Jack Cafferty decided he should tell everyone what he thought about “celebrities who travel around in private gas-guzzling jets” while they “tell the rest of us how to live”.

He tried to explain that “it’s the hypocrisy” that makes him so unhappy with celebrities who travel in an “anti-green” manner.

Jack insisted that everyone should go to his website at CNN.com/Cafferty to read and respond to his piece.  I did – and I’ve copied my response below.

———————————————————————-

Mr. Cafferty, YOU ARE AN IDIOT.

The impact of a celebrity’s message always carries a lot of weight with the general public. The amount of energy required to power their transportation matters very, very little to me. Is it really such a big deal – or even a sign of hypocrisy? Especially when you use Al Gore as an example.

Jack, do I care about hypocrisy? Absolutely. But we’re talking about the environment – the very thing that needs a passionate voice in this country. And all you’re doing is being nit-picky and whiney. Honestly.

I was very disappointed to hear what you said and had to turn the TV off. You really sound more like you’re carrying water for your anti-green bosses than someone who is supposedly so concerned about hypocrisy.

Get real. The environment is in serious danger. And all you want to do is complain about what environmentalists are doing wrong.

——————————————

Please take a look at his article at the following link:

http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2009/12/01/why-do-celebrities-who-travel-via-private-jet-tell-us-to-save-the-environment/#addcomment

—————————————————————-
Why do celebrities who travel via private jet tell us to save the environment?
Posted: 05:00 PM ET

FROM CNN’s Jack Cafferty:

The hypocrisy of some celebrities knows no bounds.

The London Times has a piece called “Taking the private jet to Copenhagen” – a reference to the upcoming international climate summit. This report highlights actors, musicians, politicians and other so-called “green” celebrities who have fleets of jets, multiple homes, and on and on – leaving carbon footprints as they travel through life that would put a dinosaur to shame.
Actress Gwyneth Paltrow is pictured behind the wheel of an SUV.  (website)

For example:

* John Travolta has 5 private jets (including a Boeing 707). He once flew to London on one of them to encourage the British to fight global warming.

* Harrison Ford used to own a Gulfstream jet, but now makes due with a smaller Cessna Citation Sovereign eight seat jet, four propeller planes and a helicopter.

* Oprah Winfrey, who preaches about being environmentally friendly on her TV show, traveled in a 13-seat Gulfstream jet for years until she replaced it with a faster Bombardier Global Express.

* Tom Cruise has five planes, including a customized Gulfstream jet.

* As for the king of global warming preachers, Al Gore: It’s been estimated his Tennessee mansion uses 20 times the electricity of an average U.S. home. And he spends $500 a month just to heat his indoor swimming pool.

* Meanwhile recent owners of gas guzzling SUVs include Gwyneth Paltrow, Barbra Streisand and Cameron Diaz.

All of the above mentioned celebrities are active to a greater or lesser degree in urging the rest of us to fight global warming.

Here’s my question to you: Why do celebrities who travel around in private jets want to tell the rest of us how to save the environment?

Tune in to the Situation Room at 5pm to see if Jack reads your answer on air.

And, we love to know where you’re writing from, so please include your city and state with your
comment.